Abstract
Nowadays, mobile learning is anticipated as an important instructional device that provides students with the opportunity of being involved in learning and teaching environments whenever and wherever they want. Thus, mobile learning will turn into being one of the most significant environments of distance instruction. The purpose of this study is to analyze perceptions of Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU) undergraduate IT students for mobile learning, particularly in terms of effectiveness and expectations. Furthermore, negative and positive perceptions of the students on how mobile learning is being used and whether it enhances learning are assessed through questionnaires. This study is designed as quantitative research. For this purpose, close-ended items are conducted as a data collection method. The outcome of the study indicated that students are interested in new technology devices since it provides them with an adaptive and interactive instructional environment and gives them the opportunity to take the best use of their time and find their own learning style. Hence, it caters the theory that mobile learning could be a good alternative for learning and easy to use

Keywords
Mobile learning, Instructional technology, Technology dependency

Cite this paper
Mobina Beheshti, Prof.Dr.Mustafa Ilkan, Maryam Behandish, Schoology! Netbookology! Learning with Mobile Devices: A Case Study of EMU Undergraduate IT Students , SCIREA Journal of Education. Volume 4, Issue 2, April 2019 | PP. 35-49.

References

[ 1 ]	Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., Haywood, K., New Media, C., et al. (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report , The New Media Consortium.
[ 2 ]	Pohio, K., & Falloon, G. (2010). Deliberate acts of virtual communication: Cellphones as a tool to enhance student learning and engagement. Set: Research Information for Teachers, Wellington .
[ 3 ]	Chase, E. M and Herrod, M. (2005). College Student Behaviors and Attitudes Towards Technology on Campus. Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA. (2007) Presented at the Broadcast Educators Association Conference, Las Vegas, NV. USA.
[ 4 ]	Lan, Y.-F., & Huang, S.-M. (2012). Using mobile learning to improve the reflection: a case study of traffic violation. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 179–193.
[ 5 ]	Valk, J., Rashid, A.T., & Elder L. (2010). Using mobile phones to improve educational outcomes: An analysis of evidence from Asia. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 117–140.
[ 6 ]	Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95–110.
[ 7 ]	Neerja, V. and V. S. N. (2014). Student's Perception on the Effectiveness of Mobile Learning in an Institutional Context. Research Journal of ELT, Vol 3. Issue 1. PP 26-36.
[ 8 ]	Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2002). M-learning: Learning in transit. In P. Lewis (Ed.), The changing face of CALL: A Japanese perspective (pp. 229–243). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger
[ 9 ]	Stockwell, G. (2008). Investigating Learner Preparedness for and Usage Patterns of Mobile Language Learning. ReCALL, 20(03), 253–270. doi:10.1017/S0958344008000232
[ 10 ]	Maniar, N., Bennett, E., Hand, S., & Allan, G. (2008). The effect of mobile phone screen size on video based learning. Journal of Software, 3(4), 51–61.
[ 11 ]	Barkastas-Tasos, A. & Malone, J. (2005). A typology of mathematics teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning mathematics and instructional practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 69–90.
[ 12 ]	Rudd, K., Smith, S., & Conroy, S. (2007). A Digital Education Revolution. Retrieved from http://www.pixel.com.au/documentation//products/netsupport/netsupport_school/labors_digital_educa tion_revolution_campaign_launch.pdf
[ 13 ]	Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 157–165.
[ 14 ]	Shapley, K.S., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C., & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2010). valuating the implementation fidelity of technology immersion and its relationship with student achievement. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(4), 6-10(17)
[ 15 ]	Hemabala, J. and Suresh, E. S. M. (2013). Mobile Learning for Undergraduate Engineering Students. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology (ISSN: 2279 – 0764)Volume 02– Issue 06
[ 16 ]	Boehner, K., Gay, G., and Larkin, C. (2005). Drawing Evaluation into Design for Mobile Computing: A Case Study of the Renwick Gallery’s Handheld Education Project. Journal of Digital Libraries, Special Issue on Digital Museums, 5(3), pp. 219-230.
[ 17 ]	Barreh, K. A. and Abas, W. Z. , (2015). Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions toward the Effectiveness of Mobile Learning in University of Djibouti. International Journal of Education and Research, Vol. 3.
[ 18 ]	Zhu,Q.,Guo,W., and Hu,Y. (2012). Mobile Learning in Higher Education: Student Acceptance of Mobile Learning in Three Top Chinese University, Jönköping University.
[ 19 ]	Kim, D. , Rueckert, D., Kim, D.J., Seo, D. (2013). Students’ Perceptions and Experiences of Mobile Learning. Language Learning & Technology, V.17, (pp. 52–73).
[ 20 ]	Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 365–383. doi: 10.1080/09588220701745817
[ 21 ]	Joppe, M. (2000). The Research Process. Retrieved from: http://www.ryerson.ca/~mjoppe/rp.htm, 10 Dec 2017.